Example 1easy
- A)Ravi's explanation is incorrect because a trapezium cannot be simplified to a rectangle.
- B)Ravi's explanation is correct and accurately describes the geometric intuition behind the formula.
- C)Ravi's explanation is partially correct, but it should be A = h × (a + b) not 1/2 × h × (a + b).
- D)Ravi's explanation is incorrect; the formula involves dividing the trapezium into two triangles.
Step-by-step solution
- The area of a trapezium is given by A = 1/2 × h × (sum of parallel sides).
- The term (a+b)/2 represents the average length of the parallel sides. If we imagine stretching the shorter parallel side to match the longer, or vice versa, the 'effective' base length becomes the average. Multiplying this average base by the height 'h' indeed gives the area, just like a rectangle with that average base and height 'h'.
- Thus, Ravi's explanation correctly captures the essence of how the formula works conceptually.
Answer: Ravi's explanation is correct and accurately describes the geometric intuition behind the formula.