NCERT Solutions for Class 10 Maths Chapter 1: Real Numbers — Complete Guide with Step-by-Step Solutions
Complete step-by-step solutions for every exercise — Euclid's division lemma, Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, irrationality proofs, and decimal expansions.

Why Real Numbers Is the Perfect Chapter to Start With
Chapter 1 of NCERT Class 10 Maths — Real Numbers — sets the tone for your entire board exam preparation. This chapter revisits number theory concepts from Class 9 and takes them to a much deeper level. You will learn Euclid's Division Lemma, the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, how to prove that numbers like and are irrational, and how to determine the nature of decimal expansions of rational numbers.
From an exam perspective, this chapter is a gift. The question patterns are highly predictable: you will almost always get one HCF problem using Euclid's algorithm, one irrationality proof, and one decimal expansion question. If you master the techniques in this guide, you can comfortably secure full marks from this chapter.
The chapter has 4 exercises with a total of roughly 15 problems:
- Exercise 1.1 (3 problems): Euclid's Division Lemma and Algorithm
- Exercise 1.2 (7 problems): Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, HCF and LCM via prime factorisation
- Exercise 1.3 (3 problems): Proving irrationality using contradiction
- Exercise 1.4 (3 problems): Decimal expansions of rational numbers
This chapter typically carries 3-6 marks in the CBSE board exam and is considered one of the most scoring chapters because the algorithms and proof structures are completely systematic. Let's dive into every concept and every problem, step by step.
Key Concepts and Theorems You Must Know
Before we solve the exercises, let's build a rock-solid foundation of the core concepts. Understanding why each theorem works is just as important as knowing how to apply it.
Euclid's Division Lemma
Statement: For any two positive integers and , there exist unique integers (quotient) and (remainder) such that:
This is simply the mathematical statement of what happens when you divide one number by another. For example, when you divide by : . Here , , , , and indeed .
The key insight is the uniqueness of and . Given any pair , there is exactly one pair satisfying the conditions. This uniqueness is what makes Euclid's Division Algorithm work reliably every time.
Euclid's Division Algorithm for HCF
The algorithm uses the lemma repeatedly to find the HCF of two numbers:
Step 1: Apply the division lemma to and (where ): .
Step 2: If , then HCF . Stop.
Step 3: If , apply the lemma to and : .
Step 4: Continue this process until the remainder becomes . The last non-zero remainder (i.e., the last divisor) is the HCF.
Why does this work? At each step, The remainders keep decreasing (), so the process must terminate. When the remainder hits , the previous remainder is the HCF.
The beauty of this algorithm is that it works for any pair of positive integers, no matter how large, without needing to find prime factorisations.
Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
Statement: Every composite number can be expressed (factorised) as a product of primes, and this factorisation is unique, apart from the order in which the prime factors occur.
For example:
-
-
- (prime numbers are their own factorisation)
This theorem is the foundation for finding HCF and LCM using prime factorisation:
- HCF = product of the smallest power of each common prime factor
- LCM = product of the greatest power of each prime factor that appears in either number
Important relationship:
This identity is extremely useful for verification and for finding one quantity when the other three are known.
Irrational Numbers and Proof by Contradiction
A number that cannot be written in the form (where and are integers with ) is called irrational. Examples include , , , , and .
The standard proof technique for showing a number is irrational is proof by contradiction (also called reductio ad absurdum):
1. Assume the number is rational (i.e., it can be written as in lowest terms).
2. Derive a logical consequence that contradicts the assumption.
3. Conclude that the original assumption was wrong, so the number must be irrational.
A critical lemma used in these proofs: **If a prime divides , then divides .** This follows from the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic.
Decimal Expansions of Rational Numbers
The decimal expansion of a rational number (in lowest terms) is:
- Terminating if and only if is of the form (where are non-negative integers).
- Non-terminating repeating if has any prime factor other than or .
To convert a terminating decimal to a fraction, multiply numerator and denominator to make the denominator a power of . For example:
This concept connects to the Fundamental Theorem because the primality of the denominator's factors determines the decimal behaviour.
Exercise 1.1 — Euclid's Division Lemma (All Problems Solved)
Exercise 1.1 has 3 problems that test your ability to apply Euclid's Division Algorithm. These problems are straightforward once you master the procedure — just keep dividing until the remainder is zero.
Problem 1: Use Euclid's division algorithm to find the HCF of 135 and 225
Solution:
We need HCF(135, 225). Since , we start with and .
Step 1: Apply the division lemma:
Remainder , so continue.
Step 2: Now apply to and :
Remainder , so continue.
Step 3: Apply to and :
Remainder . Stop here.
The last non-zero remainder (equivalently, the last divisor) is .
Answer:
Verification: and . Since , confirmed that is indeed the HCF.
Problem 2: Use Euclid's division algorithm to find the HCF of 196 and 38220
Solution:
Since , we start with and .
Step 1: Apply the division lemma:
The remainder is in the very first step! This means divides exactly.
Answer:
Verification: exactly, so is indeed a factor of . And since divides itself, the HCF is .
Key takeaway: When the first division gives remainder , the smaller number is itself the HCF. This happens whenever one number is a multiple of the other.
Problem 3: Use Euclid's division algorithm to find the HCF of 867 and 255
Solution:
Since , start with and .
Step 1:
Remainder .
Step 2:
Remainder .
Step 3:
Remainder . Stop.
Answer:
Verification: and . Since , confirmed.
Additional Practice: HCF of 4052 and 12576
Solution (Board Exam Style):
Since :
Step 1:
Step 2:
Step 3:
Step 4:
Step 5:
Step 6:
Step 7:
Answer:
Note: This problem requires more steps, which is typical for larger numbers. The algorithm always terminates because the remainders form a strictly decreasing sequence: .
Practice this topic on SparkEd — free visual solutions and AI coaching
Exercise 1.1 — Extended Application Problems
Euclid's Division Lemma is not just for finding HCF. It appears in various application-type problems in board exams. Here are additional solved examples that build on the same concept.
Application: Show that every positive even integer is of the form 2q
Solution:
Let be any positive integer. By Euclid's Division Lemma with divisor :
So or .
- If : — this is even.
- If : — this is odd.
Therefore, every positive even integer is of the form , and every positive odd integer is of the form , for some non-negative integer .
Application: Show that any positive odd integer is of the form 4q + 1 or 4q + 3
Solution:
Let be any positive integer. Applying Euclid's Division Lemma with :
So , giving us four forms:
- (even)
- (odd)
- (even)
- (odd)
The odd cases are and . Therefore, any positive odd integer is of the form or .
Board exam tip: This type of problem can appear as a 2-mark or 3-mark question. The key is to apply Euclid's Lemma with the appropriate divisor and then identify which remainders give odd values.
Application: Show that the square of any positive integer is of the form 3m or 3m + 1
Solution:
Let be any positive integer. By Euclid's Division Lemma with :
Case 1: where .
Case 2: where .
Case 3: where .
In all cases, is either of the form or .
Observation: The square of any integer is never of the form . This is a useful result for irrationality proofs involving .
Exercise 1.2 — Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic (All Problems Solved)
Exercise 1.2 is the longest exercise in this chapter with 7 problems. It tests your ability to find prime factorisations and use them to compute HCF and LCM. The relationship is used for verification in every problem.
Problem 1: Express each as a product of primes — 140, 156, 3825, 5005, 7429
Solution:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
Tip for board exams: Use the factor tree method or repeated division by primes. Start with the smallest prime that divides the number.
Problem 2: Find LCM and HCF of 26 and 91, and verify the relationship
Solution:
Prime factorisations:
HCF = product of common prime factors with lowest powers
LCM = product of all prime factors with highest powers
Verification:
Problem 2 (continued): Find LCM and HCF of 510 and 92
Solution:
Prime factorisations:
HCF (the only common prime factor)
LCM
Verification:
Problem 2 (continued): Find LCM and HCF of 336 and 54
Solution:
Prime factorisations:
HCF (smallest powers of common primes and )
LCM (highest powers of all primes)
Verification:
Problem 3: Find LCM and HCF of three numbers — 12, 15, 21
Solution:
Prime factorisations:
HCF (the only prime common to all three, with minimum power )
LCM
Note: For three numbers, the relationship does not hold in general. That identity only works for two numbers. You can verify: , but .
Problem 4: Given HCF(306, 657) = 9, find LCM(306, 657)
Solution:
Using the fundamental relationship for two numbers:
Answer:
Problem 5: Check whether 6ⁿ can end with digit 0
Solution:
For a number to end with digit , it must be divisible by . In other words, both and must appear in its prime factorisation.
Now, .
The prime factorisation of contains only the primes and . The prime never appears.
By the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, since the prime factorisation is unique, cannot be a factor of .
Therefore, cannot end with the digit for any natural number .
Problem 6: Explain why 7 × 11 × 13 + 13 and 7 × 6 × 5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 + 5 are composite
Solution:
(i)
Since this number has factors other than and itself, it is composite.
(ii)
Since has factors other than and itself, it is composite.
Key insight: Taking out the common factor is the trick. In (i), is common; in (ii), is common.
Problem 7: A rectangular field 60 m by 50 m — find maximum length of wooden planks for fencing
Solution:
We need to find the maximum length of planks that can be laid along both the m side and the m side without cutting. This means the plank length must divide both and — i.e., we need .
Answer: The maximum length of each plank is m.
Number of planks needed: along the m side , along the m side , total planks (for the full perimeter).
Understanding Prime Factorisation — A Deeper Look
The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic is more profound than it might first appear. Let's explore some of its consequences and applications that help with NCERT problems.
The theorem says that every integer greater than either IS a prime or can be written as a unique product of primes. This uniqueness is the crucial part — there is exactly one way to factorise any number into primes (up to reordering).
Application to HCF and LCM:
When we write two numbers in their prime factorised form:
(where some exponents may be )
Then:
Since for any two numbers, adding the exponents gives:
This is why the HCF LCM product identity works!
Common exam pitfall: Students often forget that HCF uses the minimum power and LCM uses the maximum power. A helpful mnemonic: HCF is the "humble" (smaller) one, LCM is the "large" one.
Exercise 1.3 — Irrationality Proofs (All Problems Solved)
Exercise 1.3 is where many students feel intimidated, but the proofs follow a completely standard template. Once you learn the structure, you can prove that any expression involving (where is prime) is irrational.
The key tool is a lemma from the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic:
Lemma: If is a prime number and divides , then divides .
Proof of Lemma: Let be the prime factorisation of . Then . If the prime divides , then by the uniqueness of prime factorisation, must be one of . But then also divides .
Problem 1: Prove that √5 is irrational
Solution:
Assume, for the sake of contradiction, that is rational.
Then we can write , where and are co-prime integers (i.e., ) and .
Squaring both sides:
This tells us divides . Since is prime, by our lemma, divides .
Let for some integer . Substituting in (1):
From (2), divides , so divides .
But now **both and are divisible by **, which contradicts our assumption that and are co-prime.
Therefore, our assumption is wrong, and is irrational.
Template observation: This exact proof works for , , , or any where is prime — just replace with the relevant prime.
Problem 2: Prove that 3 + 2√5 is irrational
Solution:
Assume, for contradiction, that is rational.
Then for some co-prime integers and with .
Rearranging:
Now, since and are integers, the right side is a rational number.
But we have already proved (in Problem 1) that is irrational.
A rational number cannot equal an irrational number. This is a contradiction.
Therefore, is irrational.
Key technique: This is the "isolation" method — isolate the irrational part () on one side and show the other side is rational, giving a contradiction.
Problem 3: Prove that 1/√2 is irrational
Solution:
Assume, for contradiction, that is rational.
Then for some co-prime integers with .
Rearranging:
Since and are integers with , the right side is rational.
But is irrational (can be proved exactly like in Problem 1, replacing with ).
This contradiction means is irrational.
Additional Practice: Prove that √2 is irrational
Solution (Full proof — this is the most commonly asked version in board exams):
Assume is rational. Then , where .
Squaring:
So divides divides . Let .
Substituting in (1):
So divides divides .
But both and are even, contradicting .
Therefore, is irrational.
Additional Practice: Prove that √3 is irrational
Solution:
Assume with .
. Let .
.
Both divisible by , contradicting co-primality. Hence is irrational.
Additional Practice: Prove that 5 + 3√2 is irrational
Solution:
Assume with .
The right side is rational, but is irrational. Contradiction.
Therefore, is irrational.
The Structure of Irrationality Proofs — A Template
Every irrationality proof in NCERT Class 10 follows one of two templates. Master these and you can handle any variant the examiner throws at you.
**Template 1: Proving is irrational (where is prime)**
1. Assume with .
2. Square both sides: .
3. Conclude . Write .
4. Substitute: .
5. Conclude .
6. Contradiction: both and are divisible by , but .
**Template 2: Proving is irrational**
1. Assume it is rational, equal to .
2. Isolate : , which is rational.
3. But is irrational (proved using Template 1).
4. Contradiction. Hence is irrational.
Board exam tip: In the proof of being irrational, always state the lemma "If divides , then divides " explicitly. Some examiners deduct marks if you use this fact without stating it.
Exercise 1.4 — Decimal Expansions of Rational Numbers (All Problems Solved)
Exercise 1.4 tests whether you can determine if a rational number has a terminating or non-terminating repeating decimal expansion. The rule is simple but must be applied carefully.
Problem 1: Without actual division, state whether the following have terminating or non-terminating repeating decimals
The Rule: (in lowest terms) has a terminating decimal (for non-negative integers ).
(i) : Here . Since the denominator is of the form , the decimal is terminating.
(ii) : Here . Terminating.
(iii) : First reduce: (since and ). The denominator has prime factors . Since and are present (not just s and s), the decimal is non-terminating repeating.
(iv) : Simplify: . Now . Since , the decimal is terminating.
Problem 1 (continued): More fractions to classify
(v) : Here . The denominator contains a prime factor () other than or . So the decimal is non-terminating repeating.
(vi) : The denominator is already in the form with , . Terminating.
(vii) : The denominator has factor . Non-terminating repeating.
(viii) : Simplify first! . Denominator . Terminating.
Critical reminder: Always simplify the fraction to lowest terms first before checking the denominator. If you skip this step, you might incorrectly classify fractions like (which simplifies to , terminating) or (which simplifies to , non-terminating).
Problem 2: Write down the decimal expansions of the terminating fractions from Problem 1
Solution:
For each terminating fraction, we convert the denominator to a power of by multiplying both numerator and denominator by the appropriate factor of or :
(i)
(ii)
(iv)
(vi)
(viii)
Method: To make the denominator a power of , check which prime is "missing" or has a smaller exponent. If denominator is , multiply by to get .
Problem 3: Express the following in p/q form
Solution:
(i)
Let
(ii)
Let
(iii)
Let
Technique: Multiply by where is the number of repeating digits, then subtract to eliminate the repeating part.
Converting Repeating Decimals — Extended Examples
Repeating decimals are a common area where students lose marks due to algebraic errors. Let's work through a few more examples to build confidence.
Example 1: Convert to .
Let
Example 2: Convert to .
Let
Example 3: Convert to .
Let
General rule: If there are non-repeating digits after the decimal point and repeating digits, multiply by and , then subtract.
Common Mistakes Students Make in Real Numbers
Here are the most frequent errors that cost students marks in board exams. Study these carefully and make sure you don't fall into these traps:
1. Not writing the division lemma equation properly:
* Mistake: Jumping straight to the answer without showing at each step.
* Fix: Write out every step explicitly: , then , etc. Examiners award marks for each step.
2. Confusing HCF and LCM formulas:
* Mistake: Using maximum powers for HCF or minimum powers for LCM.
* Fix: HCF = product of common primes with smallest powers. LCM = product of all primes with largest powers. Remember: HCF is the "humble" one.
3. Not reducing fractions to lowest terms:
* Mistake: Checking and seeing that has a factor of , then concluding it's non-terminating.
* Fix: Always simplify first. , and , so it's terminating.
4. Forgetting to state the assumption in irrationality proofs:
* Mistake: Starting the proof by squaring directly without stating the assumption.
* Fix: Always begin with: "Assume, for contradiction, that is rational. Then where are co-prime integers."
5. Not mentioning co-primality:
* Mistake: Writing without specifying that and are co-prime.
* Fix: The entire proof hinges on the co-prime condition. Without it, the contradiction at the end doesn't work. Always state it explicitly.
6. **Using HCF LCM = product for three numbers:**
* Mistake: Applying .
* Fix: This identity only works for two numbers. For three numbers, compute HCF and LCM separately using prime factorisations.
7. Not verifying HCF and LCM:
* Mistake: Skipping the verification step.
* Fix: Always check that . This catches arithmetic errors and earns you an extra mark.
Board Exam Strategy: Scoring Full Marks in Real Numbers
Real Numbers is worth 3-6 marks in the CBSE board exam and is one of the most predictable chapters. Here is your strategy:
Expected Question Patterns:
* 1 Mark (MCQ/VSA): Identifying whether a decimal is terminating or non-terminating; finding HCF or LCM of small numbers; stating whether can end with digit .
* 2-3 Marks (SA): Finding HCF using Euclid's Division Algorithm; finding HCF and LCM using prime factorisation with verification; showing that a number is of a certain form using Euclid's Lemma.
* 3-5 Marks (LA): Proving , , or is irrational; proving expressions like or are irrational.
High-Priority Topics:
1. Irrationality proof of or — appears in almost every exam
2. HCF using Euclid's Algorithm — very frequently asked
3. HCF and LCM via prime factorisation with verification
4. Decimal expansion classification
Time Allocation:
- 1-mark MCQ: 1-2 minutes
- 2-3 mark SA: 4-5 minutes
- 3-5 mark proof: 6-8 minutes
Power Tips:
- For irrationality proofs, **memorise the proof of ** word-for-word. The proofs for , , etc., are identical — just change the prime number.
- For the isolation method (proving is irrational), the proof is only 4-5 lines. Don't overthink it.
- In Euclid's Algorithm problems, show every division step — each step earns marks.
- For decimal expansion, always simplify the fraction first before checking the denominator.
Practice these on SparkEd's Real Numbers practice page to build exam-level speed.
Connections to Other Chapters
Real Numbers doesn't exist in isolation — it connects to several other chapters in meaningful ways:
Connection to Polynomials (Chapter 2): The concept of factors and divisibility from Real Numbers extends to polynomial factors. The Division Algorithm for Polynomials in Chapter 2 is the polynomial analogue of Euclid's Division Lemma.
Connection to Quadratic Equations (Chapter 4): When you solve a quadratic equation and get roots like , you now know this is irrational (because is irrational, and a rational number plus/times an irrational number is irrational).
Connection to Coordinate Geometry (Chapter 7): The distance formula involves square roots. For instance, the distance between and is , which is irrational. This means you can't always express distances as neat fractions.
Connection to Statistics (Chapter 13): Understanding rational vs. irrational numbers helps when dealing with mean, median, and mode calculations that produce non-terminating decimals.
Understanding these connections gives you a deeper appreciation for why Real Numbers is placed as Chapter 1 — it truly is the foundation for everything that follows.
Important Formulas and Results — Quick Reference
Here is your revision cheat sheet for Chapter 1. Bookmark this section for quick review before the exam:
Euclid's Division Lemma: , where
Euclid's Division Algorithm: Repeatedly apply the lemma until remainder . Last non-zero remainder HCF.
Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic: Every composite number has a unique prime factorisation.
HCF by prime factorisation: Product of common primes with least powers.
LCM by prime factorisation: Product of all primes with greatest powers.
HCF-LCM relationship:
Terminating decimal condition: (lowest terms) terminates
**Irrationality of :** Proved by contradiction using the lemma: if then (for prime ).
Key lemma: If is prime and , then .
Useful forms (Euclid's Lemma applications):
- Any integer: (even) or (odd)
- Any integer: , , or
- Square of any integer: or (never )
- Cube of any integer: , , or
Additional HOTS and Board Exam Practice Problems
These higher-order thinking problems go beyond the basic NCERT exercises and test deeper understanding. They are the types of problems that appear as 4-5 mark questions in board exams and sample papers.
HOTS Problem 1: HCF and LCM with three numbers
Problem: Find HCF and LCM of .
Solution:
, ,
These three numbers share no common prime factor.
(co-prime numbers)
Key insight: When three numbers are pairwise co-prime, their HCF is and their LCM is the product of all three.
HOTS Problem 2: Proving a product expression is composite
Problem: Show that is divisible by for any odd positive integer .
Solution:
Any odd positive integer can be written as for some non-negative integer .
Now, among any two consecutive integers and , one must be even. So is always even, say .
Therefore , which is divisible by .
HOTS Problem 3: Using Euclid's Lemma for divisibility
Problem: Prove that the product of three consecutive positive integers is divisible by .
Solution:
Let the three consecutive integers be .
Divisibility by 2: Among any two consecutive integers, one is even. So has at least one even factor, making the product divisible by .
Divisibility by 3: By Euclid's Lemma with , any integer is of the form , , or . Among three consecutive integers, exactly one is divisible by .
Since the product is divisible by both and , and , the product is divisible by .
HOTS Problem 4: LCM-based word problem
Problem: Three bells ring at intervals of , , and minutes. If they all ring together at 8:00 AM, when will they next ring together?
Solution:
We need the LCM of , , and .
, ,
minutes hours.
Answer: They will next ring together at 11:00 AM.
Real-world connection: LCM problems appear in contexts involving periodic events — traffic lights, bus schedules, bell timings, etc.
HOTS Problem 5: Proving a sum is irrational
Problem: Prove that is irrational.
Solution:
Assume where is rational.
Squaring:
The right side is rational (since is rational), but is irrational (since is not a perfect square, the same proof technique as works).
Contradiction. Hence is irrational.
Note: This problem is harder than standard NCERT problems but appears in sample papers. The trick is squaring to create a single square root term.
Previous Year Board Exam Questions — Solved
Here are actual questions from recent CBSE board exams and sample papers, solved with the level of detail expected by examiners.
Board Q1: Find HCF of 56 and 72 using Euclid's Division Algorithm
Solution (2024 Board Style):
Since :
Step 1:
Step 2:
Step 3:
Verification by prime factorisation:
,
Board Q2: Given that HCF(210, 55) = 5, find LCM(210, 55)
Solution:
Using :
Answer:
Board Q3: Prove that 3 + 2√5 is irrational
Solution (Full marks answer):
**We first prove that is irrational.**
Assume is rational. Then where are co-prime and .
Squaring: ... (i)
Since divides and is prime, divides . [Using: if is prime and , then ]
Let . From (i): .
So divides divides .
Both divisible by . Contradicts .
is irrational.
**Now we prove is irrational.**
Assume is rational, say with .
— this is rational.
But is irrational (proved above). Contradiction.
is irrational.
Examiner's note: Full marks requires proving irrational first (or at least stating it was proved earlier).
Boost Your Preparation with SparkEd
You've now gone through every concept, every exercise, and every problem type from Chapter 1 — Real Numbers. But reading solutions alone won't earn you full marks; you need practice.
Here's how SparkEd can help:
* Practice by Difficulty: On our Real Numbers practice page, work through problems sorted into Level 1 (basic), Level 2 (intermediate), and Level 3 (board-level). Build confidence step by step.
* AI Math Solver: Stuck on an HCF problem or can't figure out why a decimal is non-terminating? Paste your problem into our AI Solver and get a detailed, step-by-step solution with clear reasoning.
* AI Coach: Get personalised recommendations on which topics need more practice based on your performance. The Coach identifies your weak spots before the examiner does.
* Cross-Topic Practice: Real Numbers connects to Polynomials (Chapter 2), Quadratic Equations (Chapter 4), and more. Explore all chapters on our Class 10 CBSE programs page.
Head over to sparkedmaths.com and start practising today. Every problem you solve now is a mark earned on exam day!
Practice These Topics on SparkEd
Frequently Asked Questions
Try SparkEd Free
Visual step-by-step solutions, three difficulty levels of practice, and an AI-powered Spark coach to guide you when you are stuck. Pick your class and board to start.
Start Practicing NowYou might also like

Areas Related to Circles Class 10: Sectors, Segments & Solved Problems
Master Areas Related to Circles Class 10 CBSE. Learn area of sector, segment, arc length, areas of combinations with for...

CBSE Class 10 Maths Important Questions 2026: Chapter-Wise with Solutions
CBSE Class 10 Maths important questions 2026 chapter-wise with solutions. Practice 2-3 key questions per chapter, markin...

Pair of Linear Equations Class 10: All 5 Methods with Solved Examples
Master Pair of Linear Equations Class 10 CBSE. Learn graphical, substitution, elimination, cross-multiplication methods,...